20
Oct


huge-sails-like-the-wings-of-bats

. . . 6th Sailing . . .

presented by Peter Yovu




How do we write about Nature?


This Sailing honors Robert Spiess, featured in Montage #32. To be thorough about this, I should say it also honors Henry David Thoreau. Here is one of Spiess’ many “speculations on haiku”:

“Haiku poets should give full consideration to Thoreau’s observation: ‘How much is written about nature as somebody has portrayed her, how little about Nature as she is, and chiefly concerns us.’”

“Full consideration” of this observation will undoubtedly open up numerous questions, not only about the nature of Nature, but also, of course, about the role of the haiku poet in portraying “her”. (Interesting that Thoreau anthropomorphizes Nature, and yes I realize it was, and to some extent still is, customary to do so. I’ll continue in that fashion to maintain his tone).

One question: is it possible to portray Nature “as she is”?

Another: what is it about Nature, nearly 150 years after Thoreau’s death, that “chiefly concerns” you, and how is this reflected in, and engaged by haiku?

And one last, prompted by a word I used twice above: do we portray Nature, write about her, or do we seek, bridging the gap between Nature and human nature, to write as or perhaps through her? Is there a gap?

I realize this is an enormous and possibly daunting matter, but I trust you will find your own question, your own exploration. As with the previous Sailing, I would strongly encourage you to post poems which you feel somehow embody this consideration of “Nature as she is” and not “as somebody has portrayed her”. Perhaps something from Spiess himself, or something from Thoreau.


………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Sails is a section of troutswirl that is devoted to presenting questions for discussion and debate on the nature and possibilities of haiku. Sails is overseen by Peter Yovu. For an introduction to this section, see Sails.




Category : Sails

101 Responses to “6th Sailing”


Eve Luckring November 18, 2009

Cherie, your post triggers something I’ve been thinking about in regards to Allan’s earlier comments about the need to make distinctions between things we call “Nature”, and Lorin’s reminder of how the naming of things positions us.

I’ve been reading Alain de Bottan’s The Art of Travel.
In a lovely essay called On the Sublime, he recalls Edward Burke’s thoughts on the matter–that many landscapes are beautiful, but only some are sublime.
That the sublime landscapehas to do with making us feel small, and even weak, in its presence.
This feeling of smallness is distinctly different than the smallness we may feel plenty enough in the world of humans–one that is more often about humiliation or having our wishes frustrated by others’ behaviors .

“Sublime landscapes do not therefore introduce us to our inadequacy; rather, to touch on the crux of their appeal, they allow us to conceive of a familiar inadequacy in a new and more helpful way. Sublime places repeat in grand terms a lesson that ordinary life typically introduces viciously: that the universe is mightier than we are, that we are frail and temporary and have no alternative but to accept limitations on our will; that we must bow to necessities greater than ourselves.”

Maybe the Coppenhagen climate summit should be held in the middle of the Sinai desert.

銀漢にひとさし指は溺れたり

Index finger
drowning
in the galaxy

Tomita Takuya
translated by Keiji Minato

http://www.cordite.org.au/poetry/haikunaut/tomita-takuya-%E5%86%A8%E7%94%B0%E6%8B%93%E4%B9%9F-5-haiku/