Headset (((two)))

by Scott Metz on January 31, 2010






Headsets addresses the psychological aspect of literary craft as it applies to haiku and senryu. Poetry elicits emotion and associations from readers by means of subjectively potent rhetorical devices. Classic psychotherapy questions will be asked: “What’s happening here?” and “How do you (might one) feel about that?” Readers are invited to examine their responses, and poets to explore their purposes.

Headsets is overseen by Paul Watsky.






Headset

(((two)))


More About Mood

BY Paul Watsky


Sometimes we read poetry in order to experience a soothing sense of refuge from life’s stresses. We want a gentle swoop downward to darkness on extended wing rather than rage, rage, against the dying of the light. Haiku which provide conventional images, rhythms, and diction, even perhaps a nice cliché, affirm that the world’s peaceful rituals and nostalgic consolations remain at hand, comfortably unchanged, e.g. Southard’s bland


In the garden pool,
    dark and still, a stepping-stone
        releases the moon

(The Haiku Anthology, 3rd edition, p. 190)


or Virgilio’s


after father’s wake
the long walk in the moonlight
to the darkened house

(p. 263)


Dark and still, darkened house—no surprises or discords here, nothing to disrupt sleep, and, as we know from scientific studies, excessive sleep disruption precipitates madness.

Although tending toward the cliché, dark and its cousins darkness and darken are venerable power words partaking of a western literary tradition that descends from Homer’s wine-dark sea and Milton’s well known description of hell in Paradise Lost, which hinges on the inspired oxymoron darkness visible:

A Dungeon horrible, on all sides round

As one great Furnace flam’d, yet from those flames

No light, but rather darkness visible

Serv’d onely to discover sights of woe . . . . (Lines 61-5)

Epic traditions, however, gradually degenerate, as exemplified by this oft-parodied opening sentence from a Bulwer–Lytton’s 1830 novel Paul Clifford: “It was a dark and stormy night; the rain fell in torrents—except at occasional intervals, when it was checked by a violent gust of wind which swept up the streets (for it is in London that our scene lies), rattling along the housetops, and fiercely agitating the scanty flame of the lamps that struggled against the darkness.”

A poet’s unmindful insertion of dark or one of its variants into a haiku can mean trouble, since many readers will be equipped not only with numerous unpredictable literary and other cultural associations, including death, ignorance, and racial stereotypes, but also idiosyncratic emotionally-charged memories of encountering the dark: scary nights in childhood, thrills at the movies, adventure while exploring caves, etc. All that dark constitutes a special challenge for haikuists, because a single clumsy word choice can wreck a short poem’s tone. In the 1999 edition of Cor van den Heuvel’s, The Haiku Anthology, from which all of the present column’s examples are drawn, dark, and its variants, appear in twenty-nine poems (see pps. 15, 30, 34, 47, 49, 71, 77, 83, 91, 96, 110, 148, 149, 173,190, 193, 195, 231, 233, 238, 241, 244, 247, 249, 250, 261, 262, 263), usually in the more conventional mode, but not glaringly cliche. Several, however, illustrate how, if carefully presented, dark still can increase a haiku’s stimulus value, its novelty.

One way to achieve this is by offering the starkest, zen-like simplicity, as with Kerouac’s

Birds singing
  in the dark
—Rainy dawn

(p. 96)

Minimalist, chiseled diction, just the “what is.” There’s no attempt to stage-manage a reader’s mood, to steer projections, except perhaps a cryptic dismembered echo of the homily It’s always darkest before the dawn.

Another way is to play traditional associations of dark off against the poem’s idiosyncratic context, as in Larry Gates’

The lights are going out
    in the museum, a fetus
        suddenly darkens

(p. 47)

An already-dead unborn child, deceptively reanimated by the lit-up exhibit case, suffers a second death. That’s heavy! as old-time stoners used to say—and certainly not conducive to restful sleep.

But such strategy also can produce humorous effects: Garry Gay’s first two lines, Snowflake’s fall/into the darkness, sets us up for a comic turn: of the tuba (p. 49) What a tomb! And what a sound. That tuba evokes an elaborate American scene: under gray skies a chilly halftime at the college or high school football game, bands parading on chilly fields. . . .

Then there’s the ironic approach, as exemplified by two of Alan Pizzarelli’s non-standard pieces:

a spark
falls to the ground
          darkens

that’s it

(p. 148)

The blank line after darkens allows us an interlude for maudlin projection before the poet pulls out from under us the self-indulgent rug.

And how about “Porno Movie:”

the girl
         loosens her bra
starts peeling off panties
         darkens

         25¢

(p. 149)

The editing process offers an opportunity to evaluate your haiku’s tonality. Decide what responsive mood you want your readers to experience, and whether that’s a realistic agenda. If you’re uneasy about the results try the poem out on truthful friends. If you identify a problem, ask yourself whether any previously unrecognized discordant feelings or attitudes of yours may be responsible. Make adjustments—and repeat the debugging sequence as often as necessary.



Here are a few questions that came to mind after reading Paul’s piece:

While “dark” and its cousins are, as Paul writes, “venerable power words partaking of a western literary tradition,” do you think this is where this influence is predominantly coming from when it comes to English-language haiku? My immediate, personal, associations were to a few of Bashō’s more popular poems. So, do you think the influence is western, or from translations of haikai/hokku/haiku?

Also, are there other ways to attain the same kind of mood without leaning on the use of the word “dark” or any of its variations? Can you think of examples of haiku that are able to create this mood, feeling, or idea, without being so explicit?

Lastly, is the overt use of “dark” and its cousins something we should avoid in haiku? Sometimes, “it depends,” always? Are you mindful of using it—if not avoiding it altogether—when you write?


………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………




{ 22 comments }

Merrill Ann Gonzales February 8, 2010 at 5:43 pm

I am reminded of Susan Stewart’s wonderful book about humor:
“nonsense: aspects of intertextuality in folklore and literature”
where she poses the theory that to have humor you must have pretty strong rules, and often rules that have outlived themselves into making no sense. I’ve often thought that haiku gave much of its strength to that twist that makes humor so alive. To me it’s all contained in reaching down into the word for something that can work for you in your poetry. It may not even be meaning…it may just be something even more vital. What is it about a word that makes is indespensible for any given haiku?

Paul MacNeil February 8, 2010 at 1:48 pm

The sentence of mine singled out by Eve is indeed a tangle. Sorry. When I write directly to the message box . . . ? The complex sentence could have become several paragraphs and perhaps made my points more clearly. I agree with Sandra’s agreement (ha!) that looking to other types of poetry for individual words can be hazardous or at least problematic. Allusion is a refined form of Art. As Eve mentions, Haruo Shirane discussed the vertical axis in the reprint of his speech to HSA ‘99. There and in his book is the impression that more than poetry is involved: Japanese history, military and political, and awareness of places of special occurences or feelings of emotional seriousness and or beauty (uta makura) as passed through the generations. That is what anthropologists use to define “culture” — generational transmission. And, of course a generous dollop of the arts to include Chinese arts. In Basho’s time and previous, the educated nobility had a common familiarity with the “classics” of that time. Basho’s century highlights the elevated education of the middle and merchant classes. Readers understood what “Sado Island” had been, and what “Yoshino” meant vis-a-vis a glorious vista of the cherry experience.

I did not mean to throw down red meat to the pack of degreed Professors of Literature (I know of at least three on this and the previous Headset thread at THF). I chuckle at _that_ image. Smile with me, please. The average merchant of Basho’s acquaintance knew more literature (and such cultural referents as their country’s history) than most college graduates today, at least in the US. I speculate, of course.

Back to Paul Watsky (Headset #2), I also allow that the words that can become cliche are not to be completely dropped. I sometimes teach haiku with the example of a Beethoven Symphony. Usually #5, but last weekend I attended a performance of his #6. They are called “Old Warhorses” — the opening chords of the famous Fifth are in cartoons and commercials and may be the very essence of cliche. When I see it programmed, I might cringe — oh that again. But, and this is the teaching point, it can be revealed afresh. A certain conductor, orchestra may bring it to life and show why it is and has been so popular, and is such effective Art. So too with a rainbow, dew, or frost. Such images are part of the music of haiku. In good employ, they have power.

Chris is so right, it is hard for editors and other frequent readers/students of ELH to get past hackneyed elements. I remember when we published Carolyn’s “so suddenly winter” and several of Gary’s other star haiku, not the one Chris quoted. Fresh they are. I daresay some spider haiku are in the Nest Archive. I am sure there are in dark recesses of my own notebooks.

Previous post:

Next post: